And as a certain political ideology seeks their long want to privatize, for profit and with government treasury funds, the peoples responsibilities, government agencies and on this issue and in this case the Veterans' Administration. By attacking the VA leadership now in place, and VA workers over the decades, and want this VA Secretary out, why because they're actually accomplishing long ignore by the country issues related especially to our wars and those who've served, while taking on and not allowing to be ignored the issues from our two most recent wars and long occupations. While still a decades long under funded and from the wars of, by same political ideology, budget and with the help of this present executive branch and those near to the President and that cabinet. They attack contamination's that develop in the VA care system {a few more reports here and here with congressional house hearings that can be found on that site}, as if the fault of those who work within the agency and for the care of those who've served. Which are addressed when found and attacked with the abilities the agency, highly underfunded and when at war and occupation, has at it's disposal. Never relating the care, and all the agency is responsible for, to the private sector the country rarely hears about, except with the occasional reports like this that seem to get yawns from the great majority, who seek care within these private facilities not only flush with funds but also getting public funding as well as ever growing health insurance costs.
Instead of the peoples representatives, especially in regard to the peoples responsibility, the Veterans' Administration and the very quick added needs from our rubber stamped wars, their jobs, seeking ways to help to bring about safer from contamination facilities which would then be cheaper to operate and work in while those getting care would be safer from further bodily damage and even death.
September 2, 2013 - Americans could save billions of dollars in health care costs each year if hospitals did a better job of curbing preventable infections, according to a new study.Research released today by JAMA Internal Medicine found that infections acquired during the course of medical treatment cost $9.8 billion annually. Researchers reviewed published data from 1998 through April 2013 and adjusted the costs for inflation in 2012 dollars.
The problem is so common that it has its own acronym: healthcare-associated infections, or HAI.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated in 2009 that one out of 20 hospital patients comes down with an HAI during the course of their treatment.
According to the new JAMA report, surgical site infections contribute the most to overall costs, accounting for more than a third of the total. Individual cases of surgical site infections added an average of $20,785 to a patient's medical bills. Bloodstream infections associated with a central line were less common but more expensive to treat, costing an average of $45,814 per case. read more>>>
No comments:
Post a Comment